What are changes of empires, the wreck of dynasties, with the opinions which supported them; what is the birth and extinction of religious and political systems to life? What are the revolutions of the globe which we inhabit, and the operations of the elements of which it is composed, compared with life? What is the universe of stars, and suns, of which this inhabited earth is one, and their motions, and their destiny, compared with life?
— Percy Bysshe Shelley (1792 – 1822), On Life.
Biology occupies a position among the sciences both marginal
and central. Marginal because, the living world constituting only a tiny and
very ‘special’ part of the universe, it does not seem likely that the study of
living beings will ever uncover general laws applicable outside the biosphere.
But if the whole aim of science is indeed, as I believe, to clarify man’s
relationship to the universe, then biology must be accorded a central position,
since of all the disciplines it is the one that endeavours to go most directly
to the heart of the problems that must be resolved before that of ‘human nature’
can even be framed in other than metaphysical terms.
— Jacques Monod (trans. Austryn Wainhouse), Chance
and Necessity, Fontana 1974, preface.
Gradually a new science emerged. It no longer studied plants
and animals as particular classes of natural bodies, but rather the living
organism endowed with singular properties as a result of a special kind of
organisation. Almost simultaneously, Lamarck, Treviranus and Oken used the term
‘biology’ to define this new science.
— Francois Jacob, The Logic of Life
(1973), 87.
If he can tell a horse from a cow, that is the extent of his
knowledge of zoology.
— Samuel Johnson (1709 – 1784), speaking of Oliver Goldsmith, and quoted in
Thomas Babington Macaulay’s Oliver
Goldsmith.
Taxonomy, the most underappreciated of all sciences, is the
keystone of historical disciplines.
— Stephen Jay Gould (1941 – 2002), The
Flamingo’s Smile, Penguin 1991, 19.
If we view a Porpess on the outside, there is nothing more
than a Fish, but if we look within, there is nothing less.
— Edward Tyson (1651 – 1708), The Anatomy
of a Porpess (1680).
All flying insects that walk on all fours are to be
detestable to you. There are, however, some winged creatures that walk on all
fours that you may eat: those that have jointed legs for hopping on the ground.
Of these you may eat any kind of locust, katydid, cricket or grasshopper. But
all other winged creatures that have four legs you are to detest.
— Holy Bible, Leviticus, 11:20-23, New International Version.
A Bat who fell upon the ground and was caught by a Weasel
pleaded to be spared his life. The Weasel refused, saying that he was by nature
the enemy of all birds. The Bat assured him that he was not a bird, but a
mouse, and thus was set free. Shortly afterwards the Bat again fell to the
ground and was caught by another Weasel, whom he likewise entreated not to eat
him. The Weasel said that he had a special hostility to mice. The Bat assured
him that he was not a mouse, but a bird, and thus a second time escaped.
It is wise to turn circumstances to good account.
— Aesop, The Bat and the Weasels.
— Ray Lankester (1847 – 1929)
— Georges Buffon (1707 – 1788).
— Gilbert White (1720 – 1793), The
Natural History of Selborne, (1789), Letter X.
— Jacques Monod (trans. Austryn Wainhouse), Chance
and Necessity, Fontana 1974, 100.
— Carl von Linné (Linnaeus) (1707 – 1778), The
Elements of Botany (1775), quoted by Francois Jacob, The Logic of Life (1973).
— Carl von Linné (Linnaeus) (1707 – 1778), The
Elements of Botany (1775), quoted by Francois Jacob, The Logic of Life (1973).
— Carl von Linné (Carolus Linnaeus) (1707 – 1778), quoted by Daniel Boorstin, The Discoverers, p 444.
— John Gibson, ‘Fossil fishes of Scotland’ in Science Gleanings in Many Fields (1884).
— Primo Levi (1919 – 1987), ‘The Invisible World’ in Other People’s Trades, 50.
You will find an index to this blog at the foot of this link. Please be patient: I am pedalling as fast as I can.

No comments:
Post a Comment