![]() |
| Actually, convicts: as close as I could get. |
— Jonathan Swift (1667 – 1745), ‘A Voyage to Brobdingnag’ in Gulliver’s Travels.
One of the greatest
pains to human nature is the pain of a new idea.
— Walter Bagehot (1801 – 1859), Physics and
Politics.
When in that house
MPs divide,
If they’ve a brain and cerebellum too,
They have to leave their brain outside,
And vote just as their leaders tell ‘em to.
— W. S. Gilbert (1836 – 1911) Iolanthe
When you try to explain
to politicians and civil servants what science does and how it works there’s a curious
kind of switch-off. They say ‘yes’ as if in agreement, but you know they haven’t
understood.
— David Weatherall, quoted in New Scientist
26 June 1993, 33.
It is very noticeable
that the first time they [politicians] speak in public they apologise for not being
a scientist, and they do it very publicly. But it’s not a real apology; it’s an
essential qualification for the next job.
— Jean-Patrick Connerade, quoted in New Scientist
26 June 1993, 33.
… will the public
and those in authority pay any attention to what you say, or will the politicians
go on with their lunatic game of power politics, ignoring the fact that the world
they are squabbling over will very shortly cease to exist in its old familiar form,
but will be transformed, unless they mobilize all available intelligence and all
available good will, into one huge dust bowl, inhabited by creatures whom hunger
will make more and more sub-human?
— Aldous Huxley, letter to Fairfield Osborn, 16/1/1948, Letters of Aldous Huxley, Chatto and Windus, 1969, 578.
It is paradoxical:
people in the age of science and technology live in the conviction that they can
improve their lives because they are able to grasp and exploit the complexities
of nature and the general laws of its functioning. Yet it is precisely these laws
which, in the end, tragically catch up on them and get the better of them.
— Vaclav Havel, Czech playwright (and later president), ‘Politics and conscience’
in Living in Truth, Faber 1989, 141.
Geology is related
to almost all the physical sciences, as history is to the moral. A historian should,
if possible, be at once profoundly acquainted with ethics, politics, jurisprudence,
the military art, theology; in a word with all branches of knowledge by which any
insight into human affairs, or into the moral and intellectual nature of man, can
be obtained. It would be no less desirable that a geologist should be well-versed
in chemistry, natural philosophy, mineralogy, zoology, comparative anatomy, botany;
in short, in every science relating to organic and inorganic nature.
— Sir Charles Lyell (1797 – 1875), quoted in A Thousand and One Gems of English Prose, selected by Charles Mackay,
(19th century?).
Her statistics were
more than a study, they were indeed her religion. For her Quetelet was the hero
as scientist, and the presentation copy of his Physique sociale is annotated by her on every page. Florence Nightingale
believed — and in all the actions of her life acted upon that belief — that the
administrator could only be successful if he were guided by statistical knowledge.
The legislator — to say nothing of the politician — too often failed for want of
this knowledge. Nay, she went further; she held that the universe — including human
communities — was evolving in accordance with a divine plan; that it was man’s business
to endeavour to understand this plan and guide his actions in sympathy with it.
But to understand God’s thoughts, she held we must study statistics, for these are
the measure of His purpose. Thus the study of statistics was for her a religious
duty.
— Karl Pearson The
Life, Letters and Labours of Francis Galton, vol. 2, 1924.
Philosophy, astronomy,
and politics were marked at zero, I remember. Botany variable, geology profound
as regards the mud stains from any region within fifty miles of town, chemistry
eccentric, anatomy unsystematic, sensational literature and crime records unique,
violin player, boxer, swordsman, lawyer, and self-poisoner by cocaine and tobacco.
— Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (1859-1930), Dr. Watson, in The Five Orange Pips (1892), describing Sherlock Holmes.
Theoretical physicists
tend to talk only to each other, and, like so many Cabots, to God. Either in scientific
politics or open politics, organic chemists much more often than not turn out to
be conservative: the reverse is true of biochemists.
— C. P. Snow (1905 – 1980), The Two Cultures:
a Second Look, 1963.
You will find an index to this blog at the foot of this link. Please be patient: I am pedalling as fast as I can.

No comments:
Post a Comment